The tech world is abuzz with the latest offering from Apple, the Apple Vision Pro mixed reality headset. Touted as the next big leap in immersive technology, this device has garnered significant attention from both Apple enthusiasts and the broader tech community. However, a recent revelation by popular YouTuber Jerry Rig has sparked a debate that divides fans and critics alike.
Apple Vision Pro: JerryRigEverything’s Insightful Dissection
Known for his detailed teardowns of electronic devices, JerryRigEverything took the Apple Vision Pro under his scrutiny. Costing a hefty $3500, this device is more than just an ordinary gadget; it’s an investment in cutting-edge technology. However, JerryRigEverything’s exploration was not about the software intricacies but rather a deep dive into the hardware aspect of the headset.
Labeling it as a “computer for your face,” he discovered that the Apple Vision Pro, like many of Apple’s products, is not intended for user repairs. This finding is crucial as it points to a larger trend in technology design where user serviceability is often sacrificed for aesthetics or other design priorities.
Apple Vision Pro; The Controversial Front Plate: Glass or Plastic?
The most startling revelation from the teardown was the nature of the headset’s front plate. Contrary to Apple’s claim of using ‘laminated glass,’ JerryRigEverything’s investigation suggests that this component might be plastic. This not only raises questions about durability and scratch resistance but also affects the headset’s pass-through function.
Apple has done it. Apple Vision Pro by far is the coolest & most advanced piece of technology I’ve seen in the past decade or 2. Anyone who says otherwise has not tried it or might simply be jaded due to price. I don’t care how it looks but this changes everything forever. pic.twitter.com/xbU4Oihr6h
— Dominic Carter (@DominicCarterLA) February 5, 2024
Apple Vision Pro Community Reactions: A House Divided
This discovery has sparked intense debates among Apple’s fan base and the wider tech community. On platforms like Reddit, opinions are sharply divided. Some users, like No_Bicycle, rationalize the use of plastic as a protective measure, suggesting it could act like a “crumple zone” for the device.
In contrast, others express disappointment and confusion over Apple’s material choices, especially given the premium cost of replacement parts. JorgTheElder’s comment encapsulates this frustration, questioning the rationale behind the expensive $800 replacement fee for the front “glass.”
Apple Vision Pro: Reflections on Apple’s Design Philosophy
This incident sheds light on a recurring theme in Apple’s design philosophy – the trade-off between innovation and practicality. While Apple continues to push the boundaries of technology, questions about user serviceability, material integrity, and transparency in marketing remain.
As the debate rages on, one thing is certain: the Apple Vision Pro has not only captured the imagination of tech enthusiasts but also sparked a critical conversation about the future of device design and consumer expectations in the high-tech market. The outcome of this debate could influence how tech giants approach design and transparency in their future products.
